Archive:Replace Flowdock: Difference between revisions

From The Munich Maker Lab's Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
== Alternatives ==
== Alternatives ==
* Slack
* Slack
* Stride (formaly hipchat)
* Flock
* [https://matrix.org/ Matrix] / [https://matrix.org/docs/projects/client/riot.html Riot]
* [https://matrix.org/ Matrix] / [https://matrix.org/docs/projects/client/riot.html Riot]
** Current and future development unclear. The project is looking for funding.
* [https://rocket.chat/ RocketChat]
* [https://rocket.chat/ RocketChat]
** Free: self-hosting only
* [https://about.mattermost.com/ Mattermost]
* [https://about.mattermost.com/ Mattermost]
** Free: self-hosting only
* Zulipchat
** (seems not that slick)

Revision as of 21:24, 9 September 2017

As discussed at 20170907 Plenum, we've reached the user limit for our flowdock. Should we replace it? What are some alternative options? What are features we want from it?

Features

What do we want/like/...?

  • IRC Bridge
  • Native clients for iOS, Android (besides a web view)
  • No service fees
  • Unlimited (> 250) users
  • preferable hosted (vs. self-hosting)
  • Integration of 3rd party tools (in/out) (e.g. mail, trello, feeds, custom webhooks)
  • data protection / privacy ? (is this a concern as we are a German Verein and have to tell our users?)

Alternatives

  • Slack
  • Stride (formaly hipchat)
  • Flock
  • Matrix / Riot
    • Current and future development unclear. The project is looking for funding.
  • RocketChat
    • Free: self-hosting only
  • Mattermost
    • Free: self-hosting only
  • Zulipchat
    • (seems not that slick)