Archive:Replace Flowdock: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
You are visiting an old wiki page. The information found on "Replace Flowdock" might be out of date.
No edit summary |
m (Vrs moved page Replace Flowdock to Archive:Replace Flowdock) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{outdated}} | |||
As discussed at [[20170907 Plenum]], we've reached the user limit for our flowdock. Should we replace it? What are some alternative options? What are features we want from it? | As discussed at [[20170907 Plenum]], we've reached the user limit for our flowdock. Should we replace it? What are some alternative options? What are features we want from it? | ||
Latest revision as of 16:16, 10 September 2022
As discussed at 20170907 Plenum, we've reached the user limit for our flowdock. Should we replace it? What are some alternative options? What are features we want from it?
Features
What do we want/like/...?
- IRC Bridge
- Native clients for iOS, Android (besides a web view)
- No service fees
- Unlimited (> 250) users
- preferable hosted (vs. self-hosting)
- Integration of 3rd party tools (in/out) (e.g. mail, trello, feeds, custom webhooks)
- data protection / privacy ? (is this a concern as we are a German Verein and have to tell our users?)
Alternatives
- Slack
- Stride (formaly hipchat)
- Flock
- Matrix / Riot
- Current and future development unclear. The project is looking for funding.
- RocketChat
- Free: self-hosting only
- Mattermost
- Free: self-hosting only
- Zulipchat
- (seems not that slick)